World Government

March 4, 2023 0 Comments

World government or global government, sometimes called one-worldism or cosmocracy, is the concept of a single political authority for all humanity. It generally entails some form of government through a single state or polity with jurisdiction over the entire world. World government or global government, sometimes called one-worldism or cosmocracy, is the concept of a single political authority for all humanity. It generally entails some form of government through a single state or polity with jurisdiction over the entire world. Such a government could come into existence through violent and compulsory world domination, or through the peaceful and voluntary supranational union.[5] World government is conceived in a variety of forms, which reflects its wide array of proponents, ranging from ancient kings and Enlightenment philosophers to religious utopians and secular humanists. Global government has been proposed and even attempted since antiquity. Over the last few centuries, gradual developments in international law, international relations, and international organizations, along with concurrent trends such as globalization and industrialisation, have led to greater interest and discussion about world government by both scholars and the general public. However, there has never been an executive, legislature, judiciary, military, or constitution with global jurisdiction. The inception of the United Nations in the mid-20th century remains the closest approximation to a world government, as it is by far the largest and most powerful international institution. Nevertheless, beyond its Security Council, which can issue mandatory resolutions backed by member states, the UN is limited to a mostly advisory role, with the stated purpose of fostering cooperation between existing national governments, rather than exerting authority over them. Nevertheless, the organization is still commonly viewed as either a model or preliminary step towards a proper global government. World government has supporters and detractors from across the political and ideological spectrum. Its desirability, feasibility, and institutional framework are debated among political scientists, philosophers, and scholars of international relations; it is also the subject of several popular conspiracy theories and eschatological ideas.[9] World government is frequently featured in fiction, particularly the science fiction genre, and is depicted in a variety of forms; well-known examples include the “World State” in Aldous Huxley’s Brave New World, the “Dictatorship of the Air” in H. G. Wells’s The Shape of Things to Come, and the United Nations in James S. A Corey’s The Expanse.


Origins of the idea

World government was an aspiration of ancient rulers as early as the Bronze Age (3300 BCE to 1200); Egyptian kings aimed to rule “All That the Sun Encircles”, Mesopotamian kings “All from the Sunrise to the Sunset”, and ancient Chinese and Japanese emperors “All under Heaven”. The Chinese had a particularly well-developed notion of world government in the form of Great Unity, or Da Yitong (大同), a Utopian vision for a united and just society bound by moral virtue and principles of good governance. The Han dynasty, which successfully united much of China for over four centuries, evidently aspired to this vision by erecting an Altar of the Great Unity in 113 BC.[10] Contemporaneously, the Greek historian Polybius described Roman rule over much of the known world at the time as a “marvelous” achievement worthy of consideration by future historians. The Pax Romana, a roughly two-century period of stable Roman hegemony across three continents, reflected the positive aspirations of a world government, as it was deemed to have brought prosperity and security to what was once a politically and culturally fractious region.

Early proponents


The idea of world government outlived the fall of Rome for centuries, particularly in its former heartland of Italy. In his fourteenth century work De Monarchia, Florentine poet and philosopher Dante Alighieri appealed for a universal monarchy that would work with the Roman Catholic Church to establish peace in humanity’s lifetime and the afterlife, respectively: But what has been the condition of the world since that day the seamless robe [of Pax Romana] first suffered mutilation by the claws of avarice, we can read—would that we could not also see! O human race! what tempests must need toss thee, what treasure be thrown into the sea, what shipwrecks must be endured, so long as thou, like a beast of many heads, strivest after diverse ends! Thou art sick in either intellect, and sick likewise in thy affection. Thou healest not thy high understanding by argument irrefutable, nor thy lower by the countenance of experience. Nor dost thou heal thy affection by the sweetness of divine persuasion, when the voice of the Holy Spirit breathes upon thee, ‘Behold, how good and how pleasant it is for brethren to dwell together in unity! Mercurino di Gattinara Di Gattinara was an Italian diplomat who widely promoted Dante’s De Monarchia and its call for a universal monarchy. An advisor of Maximilian I, Holy Roman Emperor, and the chancellor of Charles V, Holy Roman Emperor, he conceived global government as uniting all Christian nations under a Respublica Christiana, which was the only political entity able to establish world peace. Francisco de Vitoria.

Main article: Francisco de Vitoria

Spanish philosopher Francisco de Vitoria (c. 1483–1546) is considered one of the founders of “global political philosophy” and international law, along with Alberico Gentili and Hugo Grotius. De Vitoria conceived of the res publica totius orbis, or the “republic of the whole world”. This came at a time when the University of Salamanca was engaged in unprecedented thought concerning human rights, international law, and early economics based on the experiences of the Spanish Empire. Hugo Grotius (1583–1645)

Main article: Hugo Grotius

Title page of the 1631 second edition of De jure belli ac pacis Along with Vitoria, the Dutch philosopher and jurist Hugo Grotius is widely regarded as one of the fathers of international law; his book, De jure belli ac pacis (On the Law of War and Peace), published in Paris in 1625, is still cited as a foundational work in the field.[13] Though he does not advocate for world government per se, Grotius argues that a “common law among nations”, consisting of a framework of principles of natural law, bind all people and societies regardless of local custom.
Immanuel Kant

Immanuel Kant

Writing in 1795, Immanuel Kant considered World Citizenship to be a necessary step in establishing world peace. In his essay “Perpetual Peace: A Philosophical Sketch” (1795), Kant describes three basic requirements for organizing human affairs to permanently abolish the threat of present and future war, and, thereby, help establish a new era of lasting peace throughout the world. Specifically, Kant described his proposed peace program as containing two steps. The “Preliminary Articles” described the steps that should be taken immediately, or with all deliberate speed: 1. “No Secret Treaty of Peace Shall Be Held Valid in Which There Is Tacitly Reserved Matter for a Future War” 2. “No Independent States, Large or Small, Shall Come under the Dominion of Another State by Inheritance, Exchange, Purchase, or Donation” 3. “Standing Armies Shall in Time Be Totally Abolished” 4. “National Debts Shall Not Be Contracted with a View to the External Friction of States” 5. “No State Shall by Force Interfere with the Constitution or Government of Another State, 6. “No State Shall, during War, Permit Such Acts of Hostility Which Would Make Mutual Confidence in the Subsequent Peace Impossible: Such Are the Employment of Assassins (percussores), Poisoners (venefici), Breach of Capitulation, and Incitement to Treason (perduellio) in the Opposing State” Three Definitive Articles would provide not merely a cessation of hostilities, but a foundation on which to build a peace. 1. “The Civil Constitution of Every State Should Be Republican” 2. “The Law of Nations Shall be Founded on a Federation of Free States” 3. “The Law of World Citizenship Shall Be Limited to Conditions of Universal Hospitality” Kant argued against a world government on the grounds that it would be prone to tyranny.[14] He instead advocated for league of independent republican states akin to the intergovernmental organizations that would emerge over a century and a half later. Johann Gottlieb Fichte The year of the battle at Jena (1806), when Napoleon overwhelmed Prussia, Johann Gottlieb Fichte in Characteristics of the Present Age described what he perceived to be a very deep and dominant historical trend: There is necessary tendency in every cultivated State to extend itself generally… Such is the case in Ancient History … As the States become stronger in themselves and cast off that [Papal] foreign power, the tendency towards a Universal Monarchy over the whole Christian World necessarily comes to light… This tendency … has shown itself successively in several States which could make pretensions to such a dominion, and since the fall of the Papacy, it has become the sole animating principle of our History… Whether clearly or not—it may be obscurely—yet has this tendency lain at the root of the undertakings of many States in Modern Times… Although no individual Epoch may have contemplated this purpose, yet is this the spirit which runs through all these individual Epochs, and invisibly urges them onward.

Globalization and industrialization

Creation of international organizations

Main article: International organizations International Peace Congresses were held in Europe beginning in 1843, taking place annually 1848 until 1853. These were meetings of representatives from “peace soceities” throughout the world that promoted world peace and cooperation. The series was terminated by an interval of wars that largely undermined pacifist movements in the public sphere.

Emblem of the International Committee of the Red Cross, one of history’s oldest international organizations International organizations started forming in the late 19th century, among the earliest being the International Committee of the Red Cross in 1863, the Telegraphic Union in 1865 and the Universal Postal Union in 1874. The increase in international trade at the turn of the 20th century accelerated the formation of international organizations, and, by the start of World War I in 1914, there were approximately 450 of them. Support for the idea of establishing international law grew during this period as well. The Institute of International Law was formed in 1873 by Belgian Jurist Gustave Rolin-Jaequemyns, leading to the creation of concrete legal drafts, for example by the Swiss Johaan Bluntschli in 1866.[citation needed] In 1883, James Lorimer published “The Institutes of the Law of Nations” in which he explored the idea of a world government establishing the global rule of law. The first embryonic world parliament, called the Inter-Parliamentary Union, was organized in 1886 by Cremer and Passy, composed of legislators from many countries. In 1904 the Union formally proposed “an international congress which should meet periodically to discuss international questions”.

Joseph Smith

Main article: World Government (Mormonism) See also: Theodemocracy In the early-19th-century theology of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints, Joseph Smith taught that a theodemocracy would guide and direct the Kingdom of God (Zion) on the earth during the end times. On March 11, 1844, Smith organized a Council of Fifty, who were to work under the direction of the Priesthood authorities of his church, along with a Council of Friends. This group of three organizations was expected to rule as a world government just prior to the Millennium.

Alfred, Lord Tennyson

In 1842, the English poet Alfred, Lord Tennyson, published the oft-quoted lines “Locksley Hall”: For I dipt into the future, far as human eye could see / Saw a Vision of the world, and all the wonder that would be /… / Till the war-drum throbbed no longer / and the battle-flags were furled / In the Parliament of man, the Federation of the world. / There the common sense of most shall hold / a fretful realm in awe / And the kindly earth shall slumber / lapt in universal law.

Ulysses S. Grant

United States President Ulysses S. Grant was convinced that rapid advances in technology and industry would result in greater practical and ideological unity among humankind. In 1873, during his second presidential term, he expressed the view that: “Transport, education and rapid development of both spiritual and material relationships by means of steam power and the telegraph, all this will make great changes. I am convinced that the Great Framer of the World will so develop it that it becomes one nation so that armies and navies are no longer necessary.” Grant also believed that the governments of the world would eventually “agree on some sort of congress which will take cognizance of international questions of difficulty and whose decisions will be as binding as the decisions of the Supreme Court are upon us”.

William Gladstone

The first thinker to anticipate a kind of world unity (“great household of the world”) under the American primacy seems to be British Liberal politician William Gladstone. In 1878, he wrote: While we have been advancing with portentous rapidity, America is passing us by as if a canter. There can hardly be a doubt, as between America and England, of the belief that the daughter at no very distant time will … be unquestionably yet stronger than the mother … She [America] will probably become what we are now—head servant in the great household of the world…

Kang Youwei

In 1885, Kang Youwei published his One World Philosophy, where he based his vision on the evidence of political expansion which began in the immemorial past and went in his days on. He concludes: Finally, the present Powers of the world were formed. This process [of coalescing and forming fewer, larger units] has all taken place among the 10,000 countries over several thousand years. The progression from dispersion to union among men, and the principle [whereby] the world is [gradually] proceeding from being partitioned off to being opened up, is a spontaneous [working] of the Way of Heaven (or Nature) and human affairs. No factor, he believed, in the long run could resist the “laws of empires”. Kang Youwei projects the culmination of the ongoing world unification with the final confrontation between the United States and Germany: “Someday America will take in [all the states of] the American continent and Germany will take in all the [states of] Europe. This will hasten the world along the road to One World.”

Friedrich Nietzsche

Friedrich Nietzsche in his Beyond Good and Evil (1886) envisaged: I should rather prefer such an increase in the threatening attitude of Russia, that Europe would have to make up its mind to become equally threatening—namely, to acquire one will, by means of a new caste to rule over the Continent, a persistent, dreadful will of its own, that can set its aims thousands of years ahead. The time for petty politics is past; the next century will bring the struggle for the domination of the world.

Vacher de Lapouge

The French demographer, George Vacher de Lapouge, followed K’ang Yu-Wei in 1899 with his L’Aryen: Son Role Social. Similarly, he outlined the logistic growth of empires from the Bronze Age till his days, when “six states govern… three-quarters of the globe”, and concluded: “The moment is close when the struggle for the domination of the world is going to take place.” Vacher de Lapouge did not bet on Washington and Berlin in the final contest for world domination contrary to K’ang Yu-Wei. Like his earlier compatriot, Alexis de Tocqueville, he guessed the Cold War contenders correctly but he went one step further. He estimated the chances of the United States as favorite in the final confrontation: The reign of Europe is over, well over… The future of France seems less certain but it is unnecessary to become illusioned… I do not believe by the way that Germany might count for a much longer future… We could… envisage… the possibility that England and her immense Empire come to surrender to the United States. The latter… is the true adversary of Russia in the great struggle to come… I also believe that the United States is appealed to triumph. Otherwise, the universe would be Russian.


Main article: Baháʼí Faith and the unity of humanity In the second half of the 19th century, Bahá’u’lláh founded the Baháʼí Faith, a religion which identified the establishment of world unity and a global federation of nations as a key principle. He envisioned a set of new social structures based on participation and consultation among the world’s peoples, including a world legislature, an international court, and an international executive empowered to carry out the decisions of these legislative and judicial bodies. Connected principles of the Baháʼí religion include universal systems of weights and measures, currency unification, and the adoption of a global auxiliary language. In World Order of Bahá’u’lláh, first published in 1938, Shoghi Effendi, great-grandson of Bahá’u’lláh and the Guardian of the Baháʼí Faith from 1921 until his death in 1957, described the anticipated world government of that religion as the “world’s future super-state” with the Baháʼí Faith as the “State Religion of an independent and Sovereign Power”. According to Shoghi Effendi, “The unity of the human race, as envisaged by Bahá’u’lláh, implies the establishment of a world commonwealth in which all nations, races, creeds, and classes are closely and permanently united, and in which the autonomy of its state members and the personal freedom and initiative of the individuals that compose them are definitely and completely safeguarded. This commonwealth must, as far as we can visualize it, consist of a world legislature, whose members will, as the trustees of the whole of mankind, ultimately control the entire resources of all the component nations, and will enact such laws as shall be required to regulate the life, satisfy the needs and adjust the relationships of all races and peoples. A world executive, backed by an international Force, will carry out the decisions arrived at, apply the laws enacted by, this world legislature, and will safeguard the organic unity of the whole commonwealth. A world tribunal will adjudicate and deliver its compulsory and final verdict in all and any disputes that may arise between the various elements constituting this universal system.” In his many scriptures and messages addressed to the most prominent state leaders of his time, Bahá’u’lláh called for world reconciliation, reunification, collective security, and the peaceful settlement of disputes. Many of the most fundamental Baháʼí writings address the central issue of world unity, such as the following: “The earth is but one country and mankind its citizens”.The World Christian Encyclopedia estimated 7.1 million Baháʼís in the world in 2000, representing 218 countries.

H. G. Wells

H. G. Wells was a strong proponent of the creation of a world state, arguing that such a state would ensure world peace and justice. In Anticipations (1900), H. G. Wells envisaged that “the great urban region between Chicago and the Atlantic” will unify the English-speaking states, and this larger English-speaking unit, “the New Republic dominating the world”, will by the year 2000 become the means “by which the final peace of the world may be assured forever”. It will be “a new social Hercules that will strangle the serpents of war and national animosity in his cradle”. Such a synthesis “of the peoples now using the English tongue, I regard not only as possible but as a probable, thing”. The New Republic “will already be consciously and pretty freely controlling the general affairs of humanity before this century closes…” Its principles and opinions “must necessarily shape and determine that still ampler future of which the coming hundred years is but the opening phase”. The New Republic must ultimately become a “World-State”.

Theodore Roosevelt

As early as his 1905 statement to Congress, U.S. President Theodore Roosevelt highlighted the need for “an organization of the civilized nations” and cited the international arbitration tribunal at The Hague as a role model to be advanced further. During his acceptance speech for the 1906 Nobel Peace Prize, Roosevelt described a world federation as a “masterstroke” and advocated for some form of an international police power to maintain peace. Historian William Roscoe Thayer observed that the speech “foreshadowed many of the terms which have since been preached by the advocates of a League of Nations”, which would not be established for another 14 years. Hamilton Holt of The Independent lauded Roosevelt’s plan for a “Federation of the World”, writing that not since the “Great Design” of Henry IV has “so comprehensive a plan” for universal peace been proposed. Although Roosevelt supported global government conceptually, he was critical of specific proposals and of leaders of organizations promoting the cause of international governance. According to historian John Milton Cooper, Roosevelt praised the plan of his presidential successor, William Howard Taft, for “a league under existing conditions and with such wisdom in refusing to let adherence to the principle be clouded by insistence upon improper or unimportant methods of enforcement that we can speak of the league as a practical matter.” In a 1907 letter to Andrew Carnegie, Roosevelt expressed his hope “to see The Hague Court greatly increased in power and permanency”, and in one of his very last public speeches he said: “Let us support any reasonable plan whether in the form of a League of Nations or in any other shape, which bids fair to lessen the probable number of future wars and to limit their scope.”

Founding of the League of Nations

Main article: League of Nations

See also: Fourteen Points The League of Nations (LoN) was an intergovernmental organization founded as a result of the Treaty of Versailles in 1919–1920. At its largest size from 28 September 1934 to 23 February 1935, it had 58 members. The League’s goals included upholding the Rights of Man, such as the rights of non-whites, women, and soldiers; disarmament, preventing war through collective security, settling disputes between countries through negotiation, diplomacy, and improving global quality of life. The diplomatic philosophy behind the League represented a fundamental shift in thought from the preceding hundred years. The League lacked its own armed force and so depended on the Great Powers to enforce its resolutions and economic sanctions and provide an army when needed. However, these powers proved reluctant to do so. Lacking many of the key elements necessary to maintain world peace, the League failed to prevent World War II. Adolf Hitler withdrew Germany from the League of Nations once he planned to take over Europe. The rest of the Axis Powers soon followed him. Having failed its primary goal, the League of Nations fell apart. The League of Nations consisted of the Assembly, the council, and the Permanent Secretariat. Below these were many agencies. The Assembly was where delegates from all member states conferred. Each country was allowed three representatives and one vote.

World Communism

According to Karl Marx’s theory of historical materialism, the capitalist epoch depends on the expansion of competing geopolitical markets across the planet, atomizing the global proletariat and thus sustaining economic disparity and rivalry between markets. Eventually, this will be succeeded by a Socialist epoch in which the working class throughout the world will unite to render national distinctiveness meaningless. Although world Communism’s long-term goal is a worldwide Communist society that is stateless, which would entail an absence of any government, many anti-Communists (especially during the Cold War) have considered it naive to think that the world revolution advocated by international Communists wouldn’t lead to world domination by a single government or an alliance of several, yielding a de facto world government of a totalitarian nature. The heyday of international Communism was the period from the end of World War I (the revolutions of 1917–23) through the 1950s, before the Sino-Soviet split.

Halford Mackinder

Anticipating environmental movements for world unity, like Global Scenario Group, and such concepts as the Planetary phase of civilization and Spaceship Earth, British Geographer Sir Halford Mackinder wrote in 1931: Gradually as the arts of life improved, the forests were cleared and the marshes were drained, and the lesser natural regions were fused into greater. It may perhaps be thought that with the continuance of this process all mankind will be in the end unified … Unless I mistake, it is the message of geography that international cooperation in any future that we need consider must be based on the federal idea. If our civilization is not to go down in blind internecine conflict, there must be a development of world planning out of regional planning, just as regional planning has come from town planning.

Lionel George Curtis

Lionel George Curtis was a British official and author. He originally advocated British Empire Federalism[47] and, later in life, a world state. He fought in the Second Boer War with the City Imperial Volunteers and served as secretary to Lord Milner (a position that had also been held by adventure-novelist John Buchan), during which time he dedicated himself to working for a united self-governing South Africa. His experience of World War I and the rise of Hitler led him to conceptualize his version of a Federal World Government, which became his life work.

Competing visions during World War II

Further information: New Order (Nazism), Lebensraum, and Atlantic Charter The Nazi Party of Germany envisaged the establishment of a world government under the complete hegemony of the Third Reich. In its move to overthrow the post-World War I Treaty of Versailles, Germany had already withdrawn itself from the League of Nations, and it did not intend to join a similar internationalist organization ever again. In his stated political aim of expanding the living space (Lebensraum) of the Germanic people by destroying or driving out “lesser-deserving races” in and from other territories, dictator Adolf Hitler devised an ideological system of self-perpetuating expansionism, in which the growth of a state’s population would require the conquest of more territory which would, in turn, lead to a further growth in population which would then require even more conquests.[48] In 1927, Rudolf Hess relayed to Walther Hewel Hitler’s belief that world peace could only be acquired “when one power, the racially best one, has attained uncontested supremacy”. When this control would be achieved, this power could then set up for itself world police and assure itself “the necessary living space…. The lower races will have to restrict themselves accordingly”. During its imperial period (1868–1947), the Japanese Empire elaborated a worldview, “Hakkō ichiu”, translated as “eight corners of the world under one roof”. This was the idea behind the attempt to establish a Greater East Asia Co-Prosperity Sphere and behind the struggle for world domination. Winston Churchill’s edited copy of the final draft of the Atlantic Charter The Atlantic Charter was a published statement agreed between the United Kingdom and the United States. It was intended as the blueprint for the postwar world after World War II, and turned out to be the foundation for many of the international agreements that currently shape the world. The General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (GATT), the post-war independence of British and French possessions, and much more are derived from the Atlantic Charter. The Atlantic charter was made to show the goals of the allied powers during World War II. It first started with the United States and Great Britain, and later all the allies would follow the charter. Some goals include access to raw materials, reduction of trade restrictions, and freedom from fear and wants.

The name, The Atlantic Charter, came from a newspaper that coined the title. However, Winston Churchill would use it, and from then on the Atlantic Charter was the official name. In retaliation, the Axis powers would raise their morale and try to work their way into Great Britain. The Atlantic Charter was a stepping stone into the creation of the United Nations. U.S. President Harry S. Truman commented: “We must make the United Nations continue to work, and to be a going concern, to see that difficulties between nations may be settled just as we settle difficulties between States here in the United States. When Kansas and Colorado fall out over the waters in the Arkansas River, they don’t go to war over it; they go to the Supreme Court of the United States, and the matter is settled in a just and honorable way. There is not a difficulty in the whole world that cannot be settled in exactly the same way in a world court”. – President Truman’s remarks in Omaha, Nebraska, on June 5, 1948, at the dedication of the War Memorial.[50] The cultural moment of the late 1940s was the peak of World Federalism among Americans.

United Nations

Further information: United Nations, United Nations Parliamentary Assembly, and Garry Davis

Emblem of the United Nations

World War II (1939–1945) resulted in an unprecedented scale of destruction of lives (over 60 million dead, most of them civilians), and the use of weapons of mass destruction. Some of the acts committed against civilians during the war were on such a massive scale of savagery, they came to be widely considered as crimes against humanity itself. As the war’s conclusion drew near, many shocked voices called for the establishment of institutions able to permanently prevent deadly international conflicts. This led to the founding of the United Nations (UN) in 1945, which adopted the Universal Declaration of Human Rights in 1948. Many, however, felt that the UN, essentially a forum for discussion and coordination between sovereign governments, was insufficiently empowered for the task. A number of prominent persons, such as Albert Einstein, Winston Churchill, Bertrand Russell and Mahatma Gandhi, called on governments to proceed further by taking gradual steps towards forming an effectual federal world government. The United Nations main goal is to work on international law, international security, economic development, human rights, social progress, and eventually world peace. The United Nations replaced the League of Nations in 1945, after World War II. Almost every internationally recognized country is in the U.N.; as it contains 193 member states out of the 196 total nations of the world. The United Nations gather regularly in order to solve big problems throughout the world. There are six official languages: Arabic, Chinese, English, French, Russian and Spanish.

The United Nations is also financed by some of the wealthiest nations. The flag shows the Earth from a map that shows all of the populated continents. Emblem of the United Nations Parliamentary Assembly A United Nations Parliamentary Assembly (UNPA) is a proposed addition to the United Nations System that would allow for participation of member nations’ legislators and, eventually, direct election of UN parliament members by citizens worldwide. The idea of a world parliament was raised at the founding of the League of Nations in the 1920s and again following the end of World War II in 1945, but remained dormant throughout the Cold War.[51] In the 1990s and 2000s, the rise of global trade and the power of world organizations that govern it led to calls for a parliamentary assembly to scrutinize their activity. The Campaign for a United Nations Parliamentary Assembly was formed in 2007 by Democracy Without Borders to coordinate pro-UNPA efforts, which as of January 2019 has received the support of over 1,500 Members of Parliament from over 100 countries worldwide, in addition to numerous non-governmental organizations, Nobel and Right Livelihood laureates and heads or former heads of state or government and foreign ministers. In France, 1948, Garry Davis began an unauthorized speech calling for a world government from the balcony of the UN General Assembly, until he was dragged away by the guards. Davis renounced his American citizenship and started a Registry of World Citizens. On September 4, 1953, Davis announced from the city hall of Ellsworth, Maine, the formation of the “World Government of World Citizens” based on 3 “World Laws”One God (or Absolute Value), One World, and One Humanity. Following this declaration, mandated, he claimed, by Article twenty one, Section three of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, he formed the United World Service Authority in New York City as the administrative agency of the new government. Its first task was to design and begin selling “World Passports”, which the organization argues is legitimatised by on Article 13, Section 2 of the UDHR.

World Federalist Movement

Main article: World Federalist Movement The years between the end of World War II and the start of the Korean War—which roughly marked the entrenchment of Cold War polarity—saw a flourishing of the nascent world federalist movement.[2][54] Wendell Willkie’s 1943 book One World sold over 2 million copies, laying out many of the argument and principles that would inspire global federalism. A contemporaneous work, Emery Reves’ The Anatomy of Peace (1945), argued for replacing the UN with a federal world government. The world federalist movement in the U.S., led by diverse figures such as Grenville Clark, Norman Cousins, Alan Cranston and Robert Hutchins, grew larger and more prominent: in 1947, several grassroots organizations merged to form the United World Federalists—later renamed the World Federalist Association, then Citizens for Global Solutions—claiming 47,000 members by 1949. Similar movements concurrently formed in many other countries, culminating in a 1947 meeting in Montreux, Switzerland that formed a global coalition called the World Federalist Movement. By 1950, the movement claimed 56 member groups in 22 countries, with some 156,000 members.

World Passport

The World Passport is a 45-page document sold by the World Service Authority, a nonprofit organization that advocates for world government and global citizenship. The World Passport is inspired by Article 13, Section 2, of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, which enshrines the right to freedom of movement worldwide. World Passports have allegedly been accepted sporadically by some 174 countries, but no immigration authority has a de facto or de jure policy of acceptance with regards to the document. The latest edition of the World Passport, which has been on sale since January 2007, is an MRD (machine-readable document) with an alphanumeric code bar enabling computer input plus an embedded “ghost” photo for security, printing overcovered with a plastic film. The document is in seven languages: English, French, Spanish, Russian, Arabic, Simplified Chinese and Esperanto. Two covers are available: “World Passport”, and “World Government Passport” (for registered World Citizens), (“passport” is in seven languages on both covers). Other documents sold by the WSA include a World Birth Certificate, a World Political Asylum Card, a World Marriage Certificate, and a World Identity Card. Each page within the document is numbered and each page has the World Citizen logo in the background. There are two pages for affiliation with companies, organizations, and firms. There are nineteen visa pages in the document. On the back cover there are spaces for personal information such as a person’s home address.

Cold War period

Legal Realism (1954)

Main article: E. Adamson Hoebel Legal anthropologist E. Adamson Hoebel concluded his treatise on broadening the legal realist tradition to include states that are not part of the Western world: “Whatever the idealist may desire, force and the threat of force are the ultimate power in the determination of international behavior, as in the law within the nation or tribe. But until force and the threat of force in international relations are brought under social control by the world community, by and for the world society, they remain the instruments of social anarchy and not the sanctions of world law. The creation in clear-cut terms of the corpus of world law cries for the doing. If world law, however, is to be realized at all, there will have to be a minimum of general agreement as to the nature of the physical and ideational world and the relation of men in society to it. An important and valuable next step will be found in the deep-cutting analysis of the major law systems of the contemporary world in order to lay bare their basic postulates – postulates that are too generally hidden; postulates felt, perhaps, by those who live by them, but so much taken for granted that they are rarely expressed or exposed for examination. When this is done – and it will take the efforts of many keen intellects steeped in the law of at least a dozen lands and also aware of the social nexus of the law – then mankind will be able to see clearly for the first time and clearly where the common consensus of the great living social and law systems lies. Here will be found the common postulates and values upon which the world community can build. At the same time, the truly basic points of conflict that will have to be worked upon for resolution will be revealed. Law is inherently purposive”.

Gene Rodenberry

In his Star Trek fictional universe created in the 1960s, Gene Rodenberry envisioned humankind in the 22nd century as directly governed by the United Federation of Planets, an alliance of more than 150 planetary governments headquartered on Earth, overseen by a council of representatives from member planets, and led by a president. World government is depicted as a benign and progressive force presiding over a utopian society and maintaining a spacefaring humanitarian and peacekeeping force called Starfleet (on which most stories center). Star Trek shows a positive future for humanity, Matthew Yglesias considers that part of the message is to participate as a society in the progressive project of building a utopian society, showing a crew with ethnic diversity and collaborative work, suggesting a friendly end to the Cold War and no racism, with the purpose of “To explore strange new worlds, to seek out new life and new civilizations”. Matthew says “It underscores the idea that the greatest power in the Alpha Quadrant was forged, from the beginning, through missions of peace and diplomacy, not conquest.” In addition, there is a technological utopia where there is no need for money, people work for pleasure thanks to replicators that can replicate food, clothing and any other need, the conflicts of the society are mainly external and resolved by the Starfleet with humanitarian and diplomatic missions. However, this utopian model is questioned by Paul Krugman on the basis that 30% of human needs are obtainable goods and the other 70% in services which cannot be supplied by replicators, therefore he affirms that someone must work and it is unknown whether the entire population is happy under a meritocratic model.

Post-Cold War and 21st century

While enthusiasm for multinational federalism in Europe incrementally led, over the following decades, to the formation of the European Union, the onset of the Cold War (1947–1991) eliminated the prospects of any progress towards federation with a more global scope. The movement quickly shrank in size to a much smaller core of activists, and the world government idea all but disappeared from wide public discourse. Following the end of the Cold War in 1991, interest in a federal world government and, more generally, in the global protection of human rights, was renewed. The most visible achievement of the world federalism movement during the 1990s is the Rome Statute of 1998, which led to the establishment of the International Criminal Court in 2002. In Europe, progress towards forming a federal union of European states gained much momentum, starting in 1952 as a trade deal between the German and French people led, in 1992, to the Maastricht Treaty that established the name and enlarged the agreement that the European Union is based upon. The EU expanded (1995, 2004, 2007, 2013) to encompass, in 2013, over half a billion people in 28 member states. As a result of Brexit, the Union is now composed of 27 member states. Following the EU’s example, the African Union was founded in 2002 and the Union of South American Nations in 2008.

Alexander Wendt

Wendt defines a state as an “organization possessing a monopoly on the legitimate use of organized violence within a society.”According to Wendt, a world state would need to fulfill the following requirements: 1. Monopoly on organized violence – states have exclusive use of legitimate force within their territory. 2. Legitimacy – perceived as right by their populations, and possibly the global community. 3. Sovereignty – possessing common power and legitimacy. 4. Corporate action – a collection of individuals who act together in a systematic way. A world government would not require a centrally controlled army or a central decision-making body, as long as the four conditions are fulfilled. In order to develop a world state, three changes must occur in the world system: 1. Universal security community – a peaceful system of binding dispute resolution without threat of interstate violence. 2. Universal collective security – unified response to crimes and threats. 3. Supranational authority – binding decisions are made that apply to each and every state. The development of a world state is conceptualized as a process through five stages: 1. System of states; 2. Society of states; 3. World society; 4. Collective security; 5. World state. Wendt argues that a struggle among sovereign individuals results in the formation of collective identity and eventually a state. The same forces are present within the international system and could possibly, and potentially inevitably lead to the development of a world state through this five-stage process. When the world state would emerge, the traditional expression of states would become localized expressions of the world state. This process occurs within the default state of anarchy present in the world system. Kant conceptualized the state as sovereign individuals formed out of conflict.[65] Part of the traditional philosophical objections to a world state (Kant, Hegel) are overcome by modern technological innovations. Wendt argues that new methods of communication and coordination can overcome these challenges.

Spread the love

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *